Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed2 January 20243304843

106 Sheen Road, Richmond, TW9 1UR

Planning appeal 3304843 at 106 Sheen Road, Richmond, TW9 1UR (Richmond Upon Thames London Borough Council) was dismissed on 2 January 2024 by Inspector Aqbal M, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would preserve or enhance the character and appearance of the Sheen Road Conservation Area.

extension to existing Class E unit to create additional storage & a one-bedroom flat

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Aqbal M
Postcode
TW9 1UR

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would preserve or enhance the character and appearance of the Sheen Road Conservation Area
  • The effect of the proposal on the living conditions of neighbours
  • Whether the proposal makes adequate provision for affordable housing
  • Whether the proposal makes acceptable provision for cycle storage and refuse and recycling facilities
  • Whether the proposal would exacerbate demand for on-street parking
  • Whether the proposal would be designed to achieve the required reductions in carbon emissions
  • Whether the proposal makes adequate provision against flood risk

What decided it

The proposal would harm the character and appearance of the Sheen Road Conservation Area through its poor design and scale, and the limited public benefits do not outweigh this less than substantial harm to the heritage asset.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
LP1LP3LP4LP8LP21LP22LP36LP45T5T6SI 13
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 201Paragraph 205

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

385 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Richmond upon Thames

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024

  1. Dismissed20 October 20266010388
    163 Garrick House, High Street, Hampton Hill, TW12 1BZ
  2. Dismissed1 October 20266007390
    1-54 Garden Road, Richmond, TW9 4NR
  3. Dismissed22 July 20266003237
    Land to the Rear of 256–258 Kingston Road, Land Adjacent to 26–28 Lindum Road, Teddington, TW11 9DR
  4. Dismissed14 July 20266004492
    59-67 Broad Street, Teddington, TW11 8QZ
  5. Dismissed7 July 20266010184
    69 Longford Close, Hampton Hill, TW12 1AD

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.