®Planning appeal decision
22 Upper Mall, Hammersmith, London, W6 9TA
Retention of a single storey art studio together with removal of tall, steep pitched roof and replacement with low pitched roof. Retention of a single storey conservatory attached to the new art studio at the rear of 22 Upper Mall’. Summary
- Authority
- London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham
- Appeal type
- enforcement · Enforcement Notice
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- other · Not Applicable
- Inspector
- Robbie G
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the steps required by the enforcement notice exceed what is necessary to remedy the breach of planning control or injury to amenity (ground f)
- Whether the period specified in the enforcement notice for compliance is reasonable (ground g)
- The effect of the alternative scheme on the character and appearance of the surrounding area, having particular regard to its effect upon the character or appearance of The Mall Conservation Area and the setting of Listed Buildings and Buildings of Merit
What decided it
The alternative scheme's lower roof structure would allow the relationship between the Great West Road corridor and the rear elevations of listed buildings to be better appreciated, and would not cause harm to the setting of listed buildings, the character or appearance of the conservation area, or Buildings of Merit.
Plan policies cited: London Plan (2021) Policy HC1, Local Plan (2018) Policies DC1, Local Plan (2018) Policies DC4, Local Plan (2018) Policies DC8, Local Plan (2018) Policies RTC3, Key Principles AH1, Key Principles AH2, Key Principles CAG3
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.