Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Split Decision31 August 20233305233

330-332 Uxbridge Road, LONDON, W12 7LL

Awnings on the front elevation and wrap around canopy on the side elevation of the property. Summary

Authority
London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham
Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Householder developments
Inspector
Perkins L

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the appeal development on the character and appearance of the area, including the Ingersoll & Arminger Conservation Area
  • the effect of the appeal development on highway safety

What decided it

The wrap around canopy's rigid design and incongruous shape cause less than substantial harm to the Ingersoll & Arminger Conservation Area with no public benefits to justify this harm, and it cannot achieve the required 5.3m vertical clearance for highway safety as it is not adjustable and located within 1m of the carriageway.

Framework references: 202, 56

Plan policies cited: Policy DC1, Policy DC4, Policy DC5, Policy DC8, Key Principles CAG2, Key Principles CAG3, Key Principles SD3, Key Principle TR20

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.