Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed19 January 20233305475

76 Gladstone Avenue, TWICKENHAM, TW2 7QA

erection of infill extension on ground-floor and enlargement of the roof with the addition of three dormers to create space for two bedrooms and one bathroom

Authority
Richmond Upon Thames London Borough Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Moore J

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Rosecroft Gardens Conservation Area
  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the host property

What decided it

The cumulative visual impact of the three dormers and infill extension would dominate and undermine the original deep roofscape of the host property and the character of the conservation area, with no public benefits to outweigh the identified harm.

Framework references: 199, 202

Plan policies cited: Policy LP1, Policy LP3

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.