Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed8 February 20233305723

Broadoaks, Fingerpost Lane, Norley, Cheshire, WA6 8LE

Planning appeal 3305723 at Broadoaks, Fingerpost Lane, Norley, Cheshire, WA6 8LE (Cheshire West and Chester) was dismissed on 8 February 2023 by Inspector Veevers A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policy.

a new detached dwelling

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Veevers A
Postcode
WA6 8LE

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policy
  • The effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
  • Whether the proposal would provide a suitable location for residential development with regard to the development plan strategy
  • The effect on the living conditions of occupants of Broadoaks, with particular regard to outdoor private amenity space
  • Whether the proposal would provide acceptable living conditions for future occupiers, with particular regard to outdoor private amenity space
  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • Whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness and any other harm would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The proposal constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt outside a village, causes substantial harm to openness, is in an unsuitable location contrary to development plan policy, and would unacceptably harm the living conditions of existing occupants, and these harms are not clearly outweighed by other considerations.

The substantial weight afforded to Green Belt harm and significant weight afforded to unsuitable location and harm to existing occupants' living conditions were not outweighed by the limited benefits of housing delivery and economic contributions, so very special circumstances do not exist.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy STRAT1 of the CWCLP1Policy STRAT2 of the CWCLP1Policy STRAT8 of the CWCLP1Policy STRAT9 of the CWCLP1Policy SOC5 of the CWCLP1Policy ENV6 of the CWCLP1Policy R1 of the CWCLP2Policy DM2 of the CWCLP2Policy DM3 of the CWCLP2Policy DM19 of the CWCLP2Policy HOU1 of the Norley Neighbourhood Plan
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 80Paragraph 149
Judgments
Julian Wood v SSCLG and Gravesham BC [2015] EWCA civ 195

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

29 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Cheshire West and Chester

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023

  1. Dismissed21 October 20266013998
    Holly Cottage, Post Office Lane, Norley, WA6 8NB
  2. Dismissed16 October 20266012737
    Smoker Brook Barn, Linnards Lane, Wincham, CW9 6ED
  3. Dismissed6 October 20266011029
    Oaktree, Liverpool Road, Neston, CH64 3RQ
  4. Dismissed10 September 20266005497
    Manor House Farm, Hillfoot Lane, Kingsley, Frodsham, WA6 6TB
  5. Dismissed10 September 20266005495
    Manor House Farm, Hillfoot Lane, Kingsley, Frodsham, WA6 6TB

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.