Planning appeal decision
Broadoaks, Fingerpost Lane, Norley, Cheshire, WA6 8LE
Planning appeal 3305723 at Broadoaks, Fingerpost Lane, Norley, Cheshire, WA6 8LE (Cheshire West and Chester) was dismissed on 8 February 2023 by Inspector Veevers A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policy.
a new detached dwelling
- Authority
- Cheshire West and Chester
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Veevers A
- Postcode
- WA6 8LE
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policy
- The effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
- Whether the proposal would provide a suitable location for residential development with regard to the development plan strategy
- The effect on the living conditions of occupants of Broadoaks, with particular regard to outdoor private amenity space
- Whether the proposal would provide acceptable living conditions for future occupiers, with particular regard to outdoor private amenity space
- The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
- Whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness and any other harm would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The proposal constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt outside a village, causes substantial harm to openness, is in an unsuitable location contrary to development plan policy, and would unacceptably harm the living conditions of existing occupants, and these harms are not clearly outweighed by other considerations.
The substantial weight afforded to Green Belt harm and significant weight afforded to unsuitable location and harm to existing occupants' living conditions were not outweighed by the limited benefits of housing delivery and economic contributions, so very special circumstances do not exist.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy STRAT1 of the CWCLP1Policy STRAT2 of the CWCLP1Policy STRAT8 of the CWCLP1Policy STRAT9 of the CWCLP1Policy SOC5 of the CWCLP1Policy ENV6 of the CWCLP1Policy R1 of the CWCLP2Policy DM2 of the CWCLP2Policy DM3 of the CWCLP2Policy DM19 of the CWCLP2Policy HOU1 of the Norley Neighbourhood Plan
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 80Paragraph 149
- Judgments
- Julian Wood v SSCLG and Gravesham BC [2015] EWCA civ 195
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Cheshire West and Chester
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Dismissed21 October 20266013998Holly Cottage, Post Office Lane, Norley, WA6 8NB
- Dismissed16 October 20266012737Smoker Brook Barn, Linnards Lane, Wincham, CW9 6ED
- Dismissed6 October 20266011029Oaktree, Liverpool Road, Neston, CH64 3RQ
- Dismissed10 September 20266005497Manor House Farm, Hillfoot Lane, Kingsley, Frodsham, WA6 6TB
- Dismissed10 September 20266005495Manor House Farm, Hillfoot Lane, Kingsley, Frodsham, WA6 6TB
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®