Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed10 January 20243305798

37-41 High Street, HASLEMERE, GU27 2JY

redevelopment of the rear car park to provide 8 residential flats; landscaping; associated car parking, refuse and cycle storage

Authority
Waverley Borough Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Mageean A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would represent a satisfactory standard of accommodation for future occupiers, with particular reference to outlook and the provision of amenity space
  • The effect of the proposal on the living conditions of the occupiers of neighbouring properties, with particular reference to privacy
  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • Whether the proposal would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Conservation Area, with particular reference to its scale, mass and design and also its effect on trees
  • The effect of the proposal on the setting of Tudor Cottage, a Grade II listed building
  • The effect of the proposed development on the integrity of the Wealden Health Phase ll Special Protection Area (SPA) and on the interest features for which the Devil's Punch Bowl Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) and Bramshott and Ludshott Commons SSSI have been notified

What decided it

The proposal could adversely affect the integrity of the Wealden Heaths Phase II Special Protection Area with no mitigation measures secured, which is an overriding consideration that cannot be outweighed by the public benefits of housing delivery.

The provision of much-needed homes in a sustainable location and area without five-year housing supply (significant weight) was outweighed by: the overriding concern regarding potential adverse effects on SPA integrity with no mitigation secured; unacceptable standard of accommodation for future occupiers; unacceptable harm to neighbouring living conditions; and less than substantial harm to designated heritage assets (Conservation Area and listed building setting) to which great weight must be given under Framework paragraph 205.

Framework references: 11, 135, 188, 205, 208

Plan policies cited: Policy SP2, Policy TD1, Policy HA1, Policy NE1, Policy DM4, Policy DM5, Policy DM11, Policy DM20, Policy DM21, Policy DM27, Neighbourhood Plan Policy H6, Neighbourhood Plan Policy H9

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.