Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed7 February 20233305867

28 St. Barnabas Street, London, SW1W 8QE

Planning appeal 3305867 at 28 St. Barnabas Street, London, SW1W 8QE (City of Westminster Council) was dismissed on 7 February 2023 by Inspector Redford R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposed first floor extension would affect the character and appearance of the host building and preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Belgravia Conservation Area.

a single storey rear extension with green roof, part two storey rear extension replacement double glazed windows

Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Redford R
Postcode
SW1W 8QE

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposed first floor extension would affect the character and appearance of the host building and preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Belgravia Conservation Area
  • Whether the proposed ground floor extension would affect the living conditions of the occupants of 26 St. Barnabas Street regarding outlook

What decided it

The proposed first floor extensions would harm the character and appearance of the conservation area through their use of zinc cladding and design that fails to respond positively to the homogeneity of the terraced row, and the identified public benefits do not outweigh this harm.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
City Plan 2019-2040 Policy 38City Plan 2019-2040 Policy 39City Plan 2019-2040 Policy 40City Plan 2019-2040 Policy 7City Plan 2019-2040 Policy 38C
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 189Paragraph 199Paragraph 202

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

707 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in City of Westminster Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023

  1. Dismissed28 October 20266012339
    1 Bear Street, London, WC2H 7DZ
  2. Dismissed28 October 20266009920
    25 Monmouth Road, London, W2 4UT
  3. Dismissed21 October 20266014604
    South Terrace, Third and Fourth Floor, 4 Matthew Parker Street, London, SW1H 9NP
  4. Dismissed21 October 20266012002
    Flat B, 9 Durham Terrace, London, W2 5PB
  5. Allowed21 October 20266011405
    17 Bruton Street, London, W1J 6QB

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.