Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed3 February 20233306107

Brookmead, Warbrook Lane, Eversley, Hook, RG27 0QL

Planning appeal 3306107 at Brookmead, Warbrook Lane, Eversley, Hook, RG27 0QL (Hart District Council) was dismissed on 3 February 2023 by Inspector Dowling J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would result in the loss of countryside and would adversely affect the open and rural setting and historic character of this section of countryside.

retention of new boundary fences

Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Dowling J
Postcode
RG27 0QL

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would result in the loss of countryside and would adversely affect the open and rural setting and historic character of this section of countryside
  • whether the proposal would preserve the setting of a Grade I listed building and Grade II* registered park/garden, the Westbrook House and Estate, and any features of architectural or historic interest that they possess
  • whether the proposal would preserve the character and appearance of the Eversley Street Conservation Area

What decided it

The expansion of the garden and installation of low-level panel fencing would adversely affect the character and appearance of the countryside and erode the historic rural setting of the Grade II* registered garden at Warbrook House, contrary to local plan policies and heritage protection legislation.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy SS1Policy NBE1Policy NBE2Policy NBE8Policy NBE9
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 16

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

33 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Hart

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023

  1. Dismissed8 October 20266011669
    Cedars House, Thackhams Lane, Hartley Wintney, Hook, RG27 8JG
  2. Dismissed8 September 20266005123
    Parpan, Eversley Centre, Eversley, Hook, RG27 0NJ
  3. Allowed7 September 20266011109
    16 Cricket Green, Hartley Wintney, Hook, RG27 8PP
  4. Dismissed3 September 20266004528
    Malthouse Mews, Brew House Lane, Hartley Wintney, RG27 8QA
  5. Allowed1 September 20266011801
    Esso Petrol Station, Hook Road, North Warnborough, RG29 1EU

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.