Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed26 June 20233306129

Area of Footpath, Bexhill Road, Woodingdean,, Brighton, East Sussex, BN2 6NT

described on the application form as: ‘Proposed 5G telecoms installation: H3G Phase 8 high street pole c/w wrap-around cabinet and; and 3 further additional equipment cabinets

Authority
Brighton and Hove City Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
telecoms · Minor retail and services
Inspector
Simpson L

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the siting and appearance of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area and highway safety
  • Whether any harm would be outweighed by the need for the installation to be sited as proposed, taking into account any suitable alternatives

What decided it

The significant harm to character and appearance caused by the prominent siting of the mast in close proximity to the South Downs National Park was not outweighed by the need for the development at this particular location, as the appellant had not adequately demonstrated that suitable alternative sites had been properly explored.

Framework references: 114, 115, 117

Plan policies cited: City Plan Part One Policy SS1

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.