Planning appeal decision
The Rooftop of St Margaret's Court, Brighton, East Sussex, BN2 7HS
Planning appeal 3359836 at The Rooftop of St Margaret's Court, Brighton, East Sussex, BN2 7HS (Brighton and Hove City Council) was dismissed on 12 June 2025 by Inspector Ellis G, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the siting and appearance of the proposed installation on the character and appearance of the building and the surrounding area and, if any harm would occur, whether this is outweighed by the need for the installation to be sited as proposed taking into account any suitable alternatives.
Installation of 1No. EE and 1No. H3G Antenna Aperture on Valmont frame on plinths, EE and H3G BOBs behind antennas, 1No. H3G unilateral cabinet on steel grillage, 2No. EE Unilateral cabinets on steel grillage, EE/H3G MK5 Link AC on steel grillage, 1No. EE and 1No. H3G antenna aperture on Valmont frame on plinths, EE & H3G BOB'S behind antennas, 4No. EE and 4No. H3G RRU'S on pole on Valmont tripod, 2No. EE & H3G 600Ø dishes on antenna pole, 2No. EE & H3G 600Ø dishes on antenna pole (behind) and ancillary equipment for the purposes of telecommunications development
- Authority
- Brighton and Hove City Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- telecoms · Other minor developments
- Inspector
- Ellis G
- Postcode
- BN2 7HS
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the siting and appearance of the proposed installation on the character and appearance of the building and the surrounding area and, if any harm would occur, whether this is outweighed by the need for the installation to be sited as proposed taking into account any suitable alternatives
What decided it
The visual harm to the character and appearance of the locally listed building and surrounding area, combined with inadequate exploration of less harmful alternatives, outweighed the public benefits of the telecommunications infrastructure.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- DM25CP12CP15DM18DM28S1H2
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Brighton and Hove City Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025
- Dismissed22 June 20266004405Pavement O/s 100 Goldstone Villas, Hove, BN3 3RU
- Allowed5 February 20243316438Footway of Willingdon Road, Bevendean, Brighton, BN2 4DF
- Dismissed17 October 20233316623Grass Verge at Copse Hill, Copse Hill, Westdene, Brighton, BN1 5GA
- Dismissed19 September 20233316694Grass Verge Adjoining 143 Staplefield Drive, Moulsecoomb, Brighton, BN2 4RZ
- Dismissed7 July 20233286740Coombe Lea, Grand Avenue, Hove, BN3 2NB
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®