Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed8 February 20233306348

65 The Grove, Ealing, London, W5 5LL

Planning appeal 3306348 at 65 The Grove, Ealing, London, W5 5LL (London Borough of Ealing) was dismissed on 8 February 2023 by Inspector Simpson V, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the development on the living conditions of the occupiers of adjoining residential properties, with particular regard to noise and privacy.

the use of the rear terrace for external seating

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
leisure-sport · Other minor developments
Inspector
Simpson V
Postcode
W5 5LL

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the development on the living conditions of the occupiers of adjoining residential properties, with particular regard to noise and privacy

What decided it

The unacceptable harm to the living conditions of occupiers of adjoining residential properties through increased noise and disturbance, which could not be adequately mitigated by conditions, outweighed the limited economic and social benefits of the proposal.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
London Plan (2021) Policy D3London Plan (2021) Policy D4London Plan (2021) Policy D14Ealing Development Strategy 2026 Development Plan Document (2012) Policy 1.1(g)Ealing Development Strategy 2026 Development Plan Document (2012) Policy 1.1(j)Ealing Development Strategy 2026 Development Plan Document (2012) Policy 2.10Ealing Development Management Development Plan Document (2013) Policy 7AEaling Development Management Development Plan Document (2013) Policy 7B
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 12Paragraph 55

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

391 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Ealing

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023

  1. Dismissed22 October 20266011704
    62, Cornwall Avenue, Southall, UB1 2TG
  2. Notice upheld4 September 20263365332
    81 Ashness Gardens, Greenford, UB6 0RW
  3. Dismissed28 July 20263375731
    153-155 Uxbridge Road, London, W7 3SP
  4. Notice upheld24 July 20263351648
    55 Evelyn Grove, Southall, UB1 2BP
  5. Dismissed23 July 20266007913
    Unit 2, The Three Horseshoes, South Road, Southall, UB1 1SU

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.