Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed14 December 20223306378

16 Adelaide Road, Teddington, TW11 0AY

Planning appeal 3306378 at 16 Adelaide Road, Teddington, TW11 0AY (Richmond Upon Thames London Borough Council) was dismissed on 14 December 2022 by Inspector Marshall E, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The impact of the proposal upon the original building form and the design and Park Road Teddington Conservation Area.

demolition of existing ground floor extension, erection of a new ground floor and first floor extension and dormer extension to rear

Authority
Richmond Upon Thames London Borough Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Marshall E
Postcode
TW11 0AY

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The impact of the proposal upon the original building form and the design and Park Road Teddington Conservation Area
  • The residential amenity of neighbouring occupiers (No. 8 Victoria Road) with regard to overshadowing and loss of light and No. 18 Adelaide Road with regard to outlook

What decided it

The proposal would result in less than substantial harm to the designated heritage asset (Conservation Area) and non-designated heritage asset (Buildings of Townscape Merit) through its incongruous and visually intrusive dormer design and materials, combined with unacceptable impact on neighbouring residential amenity through loss of outlook.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
LP1LP3LP4LP8
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 199Paragraph 202Paragraph 203

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

304 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Richmond upon Thames

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Dismissed28 October 20266015879
    88 Colne Road, Twickenham, TW2 6QE
  2. Dismissed28 October 20266015836
    64 First Avenue, Mortlake, London, SW14 8SR
  3. Dismissed26 October 20266011874
    61-63 Petersham Road, Richmond Upon Thames, TW10 6UT
  4. Dismissed20 October 20266010388
    163 Garrick House, High Street, Hampton Hill, TW12 1BZ
  5. Dismissed19 October 20266013760
    Pavement Os, 53-57 High Street, Whitton, TW2 7LB

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.