Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed9 February 20233306453

Flat A, 189 Castelnau, London, SW13 9ER

Planning appeal 3306453 at Flat A, 189 Castelnau, London, SW13 9ER (Richmond Upon Thames London Borough Council) was dismissed on 9 February 2023 by Inspector Clowes M, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development upon the living conditions of the occupants of the flats at 191 Castelnau with particular regard to privacy, outlook, daylight and sunlight and noise and disturbance and, the living conditions of the occupants of 193 Castelnau, with regard to privacy.

A rear balcony at second floor level above the first floor bathroom flat roof, enclosed with hand rail or glass, accessed via a doorway at the top of the staircase to the second floor

Appeal type
householder · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Clowes M
Postcode
SW13 9ER

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development upon the living conditions of the occupants of the flats at 191 Castelnau with particular regard to privacy, outlook, daylight and sunlight and noise and disturbance and, the living conditions of the occupants of 193 Castelnau, with regard to privacy

What decided it

The proximity and use of the proposed terrace would significantly harm the privacy of the occupant of the second floor flat at 191 Castelnau with regard to reciprocal views and awareness of presence when the shower room window is open, conflicting with Policy LP8 and paragraph 130 of the Framework.

The lack of harm to outlook, daylight, sunlight and noise and disturbance is neutral in the planning balance and does not outweigh the harm to privacy of the neighbouring occupant at 191 Castelnau.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy LP8 of the Richmond upon Thames Local Plan 2018House Extensions and External Alterations SPD (2015)
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 130

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

723 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Richmond upon Thames

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023

  1. Dismissed1 October 20266011219
    10 Water Lane, Richmond, TW9 1TJ
  2. Dismissed28 July 20266006160
    Tearfund, 100, Church Road, Teddington, TW11 8QE, 100, Church Road, Teddington,, TW11 8QE
  3. Notice varied and upheld13 March 20263342486
    50 Staines Rd, Twickenham, TW2 5AH
  4. Allowed26 February 20266000623
    The Duke Of Clarence, 147 High Street, Hampton Hill,, Hampton,, TW12 1NJ
  5. Dismissed29 December 20253358041
    Grosvenor Garage , Fitzgerald Avenue, East Sheen , London , SW14 8SZ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.