Planning appeal decision
Hilton Hall, Hilton Lane, Essington, Wolverhampton, WV11 2BQ
Planning appeal 3306579 at Hilton Hall, Hilton Lane, Essington, Wolverhampton, WV11 2BQ (South Staffordshire District Council) was dismissed on 21 June 2023 by Inspector Edginton A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies.
Erection of marquee to be used for hosting of events (retrospective application)
- Authority
- South Staffordshire District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- leisure-sport · Other minor developments
- Inspector
- Edginton A
- Postcode
- WV11 2BQ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
- The effect of the development on the openness of the Green Belt
- Whether the development would preserve the Grade I listed Hilton Hall, the Grade I listed Conservatory, and the Grade II listed Coach House and Stable Block or any features of special architectural or historic interest which they possess, including settings
- The effect of the development on the living conditions of occupiers of neighbouring dwellings and businesses, with particular regard to noise and disturbance
- Would the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The marquee's revenue would make only a very minor contribution to the substantial maintenance costs required, and combined with unmitigated noise impacts on neighbours, the harm to the Green Belt and heritage assets could not be outweighed by other considerations.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy GB1Policy EQ3Policy EQ11Policy EQ9
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 138Paragraph 148Paragraph 202Paragraph 130Paragraph 16
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in South Staffordshire District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Dismissed21 October 20266012641The Granary, Lyne Hill Lane, Penkridge, ST19 5NT
- Allowed25 September 20266010537Land to the Rear of 6-12 Long Lane, Newtown, Wolverhampton, WS6 6AU
- Dismissed23 September 20266008866The Paddocks, Bridgnorth Road, Stourton, DY7 6QZ
- Dismissed12 August 20266010048Hilton Colliery Farm Cottage, Red Lane, Essington, WV11 2RD
- Dismissed15 July 20266007394White Lodge, Old Stafford Road, Slade Heath, WV10 7PH
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®