Planning appeal decision
South Side of Mill Lane, Ickleton, Saffron Walden , Essex, CB10 1FN
Planning appeal 3306591 at South Side of Mill Lane, Ickleton, Saffron Walden , Essex, CB10 1FN (Essex County Council) was allowed in part (a split decision) on 27 August 2024 by Inspector Higenbottam H, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the development is justified at this location given the provision of the development plan and the need for the facility.
the change of use from previously permitted B8 storage facility to a recycled aggregate production facility. The site has existing hardstanding which would remain in place and be utilised by the proposed facility, along with two agricultural buildings, which would also be retained and be used by the p roposed facility. The site has an existing access road off the B1383 which will be used as access and egress from the site. On site parking will be provided for up to 5 x HGV’s. Appeal C: APP/Z1585/W/22/3319411 Boro Farm, Newmarket Road, Great Chesterford, Saffron Walden, Essex CB10
- Authority
- Essex County Council
- Appeal type
- enforcement · Enforcement Notice
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- minerals-waste · Change of use
- Inspector
- Higenbottam H
- Postcode
- CB10 1NU
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the development is justified at this location given the provision of the development plan and the need for the facility
- The effect of the development on the living conditions of nearby occupiers with particular regard to noise, dust and light spill
- The effect of the development on biodiversity
What decided it
The appellant's failure to justify why the unallocated appeal site was at least as suitable as allocated sites or Areas of Search under the Waste Local Plan, combined with unresolved harm to residential living conditions and biodiversity, outweighed the benefits of additional waste capacity and employment.
the significant benefits of additional employment and recycling capacity did not outweigh the harm to residential amenity, biodiversity and the character and appearance of the area, so the development conflicted with the development plan as a whole
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- WLP Policy 1WLP Policy 3WLP Policy 4WLP Policy 6MLP Policy S5ULP Policy S7ULP Policy GEN4ULP Policy GEN7ULP Policy ENV8ULP Policy ENV13
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Essex County Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Notice upheld28 August 20263361052Land Known As Land Adjoining Willow Tree House, Braintree Road, Sible Hedingham, Essex, CO9 3RL
- Allowed7 July 20263370672Veolia E S Uk Ltd, Pitsea Hall Lane, Pitsea, Basildon, SS16 4UH
- Dismissed1 September 20253357445Land South of Archers Field Close, Burnt Mills Industrial Estate, Basildon, Essex, SS13 1DN
- Dismissed22 November 20243327402Fairfields Farm, Fordham Road, Wormingford, CO6 3AQ
- Dismissed8 November 2024334749922 Britannia Gardens, Westcliff-on-Sea, SS0 8BN
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®