Planning appeal decision
Area of Footpath, Burtons Road, Hampton Hill, Teddington, TW12 1DX
Planning appeal 3306616 at Area of Footpath, Burtons Road, Hampton Hill, Teddington, TW12 1DX (Richmond Upon Thames London Borough Council) was dismissed on 9 March 2023 by Inspector Bowyer J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the siting and appearance of the development on the character and appearance of the area, including with regard to effects on the setting of 234 Uxbridge Road, a Building of Townscape Merit, and on Metropolitan Open Land.
5G telecoms installation: H3G street pole and additional equipment cabinets
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- telecoms · Minor retail and services
- Inspector
- Bowyer J
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the siting and appearance of the development on the character and appearance of the area, including with regard to effects on the setting of 234 Uxbridge Road, a Building of Townscape Merit, and on Metropolitan Open Land
- the effect of the siting of the development on flood risk
- the effect of the siting of the development on biodiversity and ecology
- if any harm would occur, whether this would be outweighed by the need for the development to be sited on the appeal site having regard to any suitable alternatives
What decided it
The failure to demonstrate that a robust sequential approach to site selection had been undertaken, combined with the unacceptable harm to the character and appearance of the area and insufficient evidence regarding flood risk, outweighed the benefits of improved telecommunications connectivity.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy LP 1Policy LP 4Policy LP 13Policy LP 15Policy LP 21Policy LP 33
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Richmond upon Thames
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Dismissed14 January 20266000266Grass Verge Tangley Park Road, Hampton, Twickenham, TW12 3YH
- Allowed5 September 20243325307Pavement Outside 27F The Quadrant , Richmond, TW9 1DN
- Dismissed1 May 20243328374Richmond Telephone Exchange, Sheen Road, London, TW9 1LW
- Dismissed12 March 20243325555Pavement O/S 38 George Street, Richmond, TW9 1HY
- Allowed2 January 20243323123Area of Grass Verge, Montrose Avenue, Hospital Bridge Road Twickenham , Middlesex, TW2 6LE
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®