Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice varied and upheld31 May 20243306691

Land at Springfield, Spring Gardens, Washington, PULBOROUGH, West Sussex, RH20 3BS

without planning permission, erection of a building in the approximate position shown edged and hatched green on the plan attached to the notice (the building) and use of this building as a gymnasium

Authority
Horsham District Council
Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
leisure-sport · Minor retail and services
Inspector
Hawkins S

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the gym is in a suitable location, having regard to the Development Plan and national policy concerning sustainable rural development
  • The effect on the character and appearance of the surrounding countryside
  • The effect on European Protected Sites

What decided it

The gym is not a sustainable rural development in an unsuitable countryside location with unacceptable harm to character and appearance and adverse impact on European Protected Sites, all in conflict with the Development Plan.

Framework references: 56, 88, 89

Plan policies cited: HDPF Policy 10, HDPF Policy 25, HDPF Policy 26, HDPF Policy 31, HDPF Policy 32, HDPF Policy 33, HDPF Policy 40, NP Policy ASH1, NP Policy ASH5, NP Policy ASH8

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.