Planning appeal decision
Land at Springfield, Spring Gardens, Washington, PULBOROUGH, West Sussex, RH20 3BS
without planning permission, erection of a building in the approximate position shown edged and hatched green on the plan attached to the notice (the building) and use of this building as a gymnasium
- Authority
- Horsham District Council
- Appeal type
- enforcement · Enforcement Notice
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- leisure-sport · Minor retail and services
- Inspector
- Hawkins S
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the gym is in a suitable location, having regard to the Development Plan and national policy concerning sustainable rural development
- The effect on the character and appearance of the surrounding countryside
- The effect on European Protected Sites
What decided it
The gym is not a sustainable rural development in an unsuitable countryside location with unacceptable harm to character and appearance and adverse impact on European Protected Sites, all in conflict with the Development Plan.
Framework references: 56, 88, 89
Plan policies cited: HDPF Policy 10, HDPF Policy 25, HDPF Policy 26, HDPF Policy 31, HDPF Policy 32, HDPF Policy 33, HDPF Policy 40, NP Policy ASH1, NP Policy ASH5, NP Policy ASH8
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®