Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed5 April 20233306901

Land at New Oak Farm, Hardwick Lane, Chertsey, Surrey, KT16 0AA

Planning appeal 3306901 at Land at New Oak Farm, Hardwick Lane, Chertsey, Surrey, KT16 0AA (Runnymede Borough Council) was allowed on 5 April 2023 by Inspector Jones M, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on the openness and purposes of the Green Belt.

change of use of land to provide an extension to an existing Gypsy/Traveller site comprising the siting of 1 Mobile Home, and 2 touring caravans, alongside the siting of a portable utility block

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Hearing
Development
caravan-gypsy · Minor traveller and caravan pitches
Inspector
Jones M
Postcode
KT16 0AA

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the openness and purposes of the Green Belt
  • the effect of the proposal on the integrity of the Thames Basin Heaths Special Protection Area (the SPA)
  • the issue of biodiversity net gain (BNG)
  • the question of the need for and supply of gypsy / traveller sites
  • the personal circumstances of the appellant
  • whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the scheme in the Green Belt

What decided it

The significant unmet need for gypsy/traveller pitches, absence of any realistic alternative site, and the best interests of the appellant's young child together established very special circumstances that clearly outweighed the Green Belt harm.

The very special circumstances relating to unmet gypsy/traveller need, lack of alternative sites, and personal circumstances (including the best interests of the child) clearly outweighed the harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness and loss of openness.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy EE19Policy EE10Policy SD7Policy SL22
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 137
Judgments
Lisa Smith v SSLUHC & Ors [2022] EWCA Civ 1391

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

73 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Runnymede Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023

  1. Dismissed29 October 20266006748
    St Merryns Copse, Chobham Road, Ottershaw, KT16 0QE
  2. Dismissed17 August 20266008286
    203 Almners Road, Lyne, KT16 0BL
  3. Allowed11 August 20266006147
    Tamar, Hurst Lane, Egham, TW20 8QJ
  4. Notice varied and upheld13 July 20263377703
    Land Adjacent to Warren Farm, Green Road, Thorpe, Surrey, TW20 8QT
  5. Dismissed12 May 20266002530
    Unit No 5, Alexandra Court, Englefield Green, Surrey, TW20 0RR

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.