Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed30 January 20233307274

23 Orchard Rise, RICHMOND, TW10 5BX

two storey side extension, single storey rear extension, replacement windows to rear with contemporary styled aluminium windows and erection of side dormer roof extension

Authority
Richmond Upon Thames London Borough Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Moore J

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development upon the character and appearance of the host property
  • Whether the proposed development would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Sheen Common Drive Conservation Area

What decided it

The proposed rear elements would fail to preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Sheen Common Drive Conservation Area and would cause less than substantial harm to its significance with no public benefits to outweigh this harm.

Framework references: 195, 199, 202

Plan policies cited: Policy LP1, Policy LP3, House Extensions and External Alterations SPD 2015, Richmond and Richmond Hill Village Planning Guidance 2016

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.