Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed1 August 20233307291

Land to the rear of 90 Front Street, Slip End , Luton, LU1 4BW

hardstanding, buildings and change of use of land

Authority
Central Bedfordshire
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
employment-industrial · Change of use
Inspector
Dade E

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies, including the effects of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • The effect of the proposal on highway safety
  • Whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The harm to Green Belt openness, character and appearance, and highway safety was not clearly outweighed by the modest economic and social benefits, and therefore very special circumstances did not exist to justify the inappropriate development.

Framework references: 111, 114, 130, 137, 147, 148, 149, 150, 174

Plan policies cited: Policy SP4, Policy HQ1, Policy EE5, Policy T2, Policy EMP3, Policy CASE10

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.