Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed7 February 20233307307

95 Southgate Road, LONDON, N1 3JS

use of the rear area for external seating in connection with the restaurant/retail unit at No. 95 Southgate Road and associated repositioning of

Authority
London Borough of Islington
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
leisure-sport · Minor retail and services
Inspector
Bayliss G

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposed development would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the East Canonbury Conservation Area
  • The effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of nearby residents, with regard to noise and disturbance, lighting, overlooking and privacy, and smells and odours

What decided it

The limited separation distances between the proposed seating area and nearby residential properties, combined with the unpredictable and attention-grabbing character of vocal noise from patrons which would be particularly noticeable in the evening when background traffic noise drops, would cause unacceptable harm to living conditions that cannot be adequately mitigated by the proposed measures.

Framework references: 197

Plan policies cited: Policy D4, Policy HC1, Policy CS8, Policy CS9, Policy DM2.1, Policy DM2.3, Policy D14, Policy DM4.2, Policy DM4.3, Policy DM6.1

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.