Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed19 July 20233307309

PAVEMENT OUTSIDE Santander Uk Plc, 132 North End, CROYDON, CR0 1UE

installation of a modern, multifunctional Hub unit featuring an integral advertisement display and defibrillator

Authority
London Borough of Croydon
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
advertisement · Other minor developments
Inspector
Guest H

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Appeal A: the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, including whether it would preserve or enhance the Central Croydon Conservation Area, and the significance of locally listed buildings
  • Appeal A: the effect of the proposed development on the functioning of the public realm
  • Appeal A: the effect of the proposed development on highway and pedestrian safety
  • Appeal B: the effect of the proposed advertisement on the visual amenity of the area and public safety

What decided it

The harm to the significance of the Central Croydon Conservation Area and the setting of locally listed buildings, combined with harm to the functioning of the public realm and highway and pedestrian safety, was not outweighed by the public benefits of the proposed development.

Framework references: 199, 202

Plan policies cited: Policy SP4, Policy D3, Policy DM18, Policy HC1, Policy D8, Policy DM29, Policy T4

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.