Planning appeal decision
Watercress Beds, Springwell Lane, Hillingdon, Harefield, WD3 8UX
Planning appeal 3307370 at Watercress Beds, Springwell Lane, Hillingdon, Harefield, WD3 8UX (London Borough of Hillingdon) was dismissed on 19 February 2024 by Inspector Williams K, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt for the purposes of the development plan and the Framework including the effect upon the openness and purposes of the Green Belt.
reuse of a redundant building for residential use with a small curtilage
- Authority
- London Borough of Hillingdon
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Williams K
- Postcode
- WD3 8UX
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt for the purposes of the development plan and the Framework including the effect upon the openness and purposes of the Green Belt
- The safety of future occupiers with regard to flood risk
- Whether it has been shown that the building is redundant, with particular regard to continued office use
- The personal circumstances of the appellant
What decided it
The unresolved flood risk to future occupiers, particularly children, combined with failure to demonstrate the building's redundancy for office use, outweighed the personal circumstances and housing benefits of the proposal.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy DMEI 4Policy G2Policy EM6Policy DMEI 9SI12Policy DMH 3
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 155Paragraph 167Paragraph 173
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in London Borough of Hillingdon
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Dismissed15 September 20266010520Grove Farm, Rickmansworth Road, Harefield, UB9 6JY
- Notice varied and upheld29 July 20253363007Land on the West Side of High Street, Harlington, Hayes, UB3 5DW
- Dismissed20 June 20253355798Khayri House, 70 Clifton Gardens, Uxbridge, Hillingdon, UB10 0EZ
- Allowed21 February 20253341154Chandigrah Summerhouse Lane, Harefield, Uxbridge, UB9 6HS
- Dismissed1 November 20243345366Grass Verge Adjacent To 19 Rutters Close, West Drayton, UB7 9AL
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®