Planning appeal decision
Woodlands Park Landfill Site, South of Slough Road, Iver, Buckinghamshire , UB8 2FX
Planning appeal 3307420 at Woodlands Park Landfill Site, South of Slough Road, Iver, Buckinghamshire , UB8 2FX (Buckinghamshire Council - South Bucks Area *) was dismissed on 31 May 2023 by Inspector Sturgess M, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would harm the character and appearance of the area.
Outline planning application with all matters reserved except for principal points of access for the redevelopment of the former landfill site to comprise a data centre development (B8 (data centre)) of up to 163,000sqm (GEA) delivered across 3 buildings, including site wide landscaping, Parkland, ancillary offices, plant and generators, and associated infrastructure
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- employment-industrial · Other Major Developments
- Inspector
- Sturgess M
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal would harm the character and appearance of the area
- whether the proposal would unacceptably harm the nature conservation value of the site, including its value as a wildlife corridor and its effects on protected species
- whether the proposal would harm the openness of the Green Belt, and whether it harms any of the purposes Green Belt is meant to serve
- whether there are any other considerations which clearly outweigh any harm to the Green Belt, by reason of inappropriateness and any other harm, sufficient to amount to very special circumstances
What decided it
The substantial harm to the Green Belt (inappropriateness, loss of openness and conflict with Green Belt purposes) together with substantial harm to character and appearance was not clearly outweighed by the other considerations, so very special circumstances did not exist.
the substantial and significant weight given to the need for data centre capacity, economic investment, jobs and other benefits did not clearly outweigh the substantial harm to the Green Belt and to the character and appearance of the area, so the appeal was dismissed
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy GB1Policy GB4Policy EP3Policy CP8Policy CP9Policy CP10Policy CP6Policy CP12Policy CP13Policy IV1Policy IV7Policy IV13
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 56Paragraph 57Paragraph 130Paragraph 138Paragraph 147Paragraph 148Paragraph 149Paragraph 150Paragraph 174Paragraph 180
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Buckinghamshire Council - South Bucks Area
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Notice varied and upheld4 September 20263349251Maple Cottage, Billett Lane, Iver, Buckinghamshire, SL3 6DJ
- Notice varied and upheld8 July 20263347247Small Acres Farm, Stoke Common Road, Fulmer , Buckinghamshire , SL3 6HA
- Allowed29 May 20263376692Boveney Court Farm Boveney Road, Dorney, Windsor, Buckinghamshire , SL4 6QG
- Notice varied and upheld14 May 20263376465Land at Denham Mount Blacksmiths Lane, Tatling End, Buckinghamshire, UB9 4HW
- Notice varied and upheld14 May 20263364195Denham Mount, Blacksmiths Lane, Tatling End, Buckinghamshire, UB9 4HW
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®