Planning appeal decision
Land South East of South Lancashire Industrial Estate, Lockett Road, Wigan, WN4 8TP
Planning appeal 3307710 at Land South East of South Lancashire Industrial Estate, Lockett Road, Wigan, WN4 8TP (Wigan Metropolitan Borough Council) was allowed on 5 May 2023 by Inspector Longmuir J, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt and whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness and any other harm would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal.
an outline planning application with details of means of access (partial details of access and details of scale, layout, appearance and landscape are reserved) for the erection of up to 625,000 sqft (58,064sqm) (GIA) of industrial, storage and distribution floorspace with ancillary offices (Use Classes B2, B8 and E(g)), construction of primary estate road off Bolton Road and associated works
- Authority
- Wigan Metropolitan Borough Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- employment-industrial · Major general industry/storage/warehousing
- Inspector
- Longmuir J
- Postcode
- WN4 8DE
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt and whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness and any other harm would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
- the effect of the proposal on the operation of the local road network, in particular congestion and pedestrian safety, notwithstanding the mitigation proposed
What decided it
The very considerable employment and economic benefits of implementing a long-standing but previously undeliverable employment allocation clearly and demonstrably outweighed the very limited Green Belt harm, establishing very special circumstances.
the very considerable benefits of the proposal (delivery of a long-allocated employment site, substantial job creation, reduced out-commuting, and environmental/transport benefits) clearly and demonstrably outweighed the very limited Green Belt harm, to which substantial weight was given, so as to amount to very special circumstances
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy CP8Policy CP7Policy CP12Policy CP5Policy EM1A
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 2Paragraph 8Paragraph 11Paragraph 56Paragraph 57Paragraph 111Paragraph 137Paragraph 138Paragraph 147Paragraph 148Paragraph 150Paragraph 180
- Judgments
- R (Hawkhurst PC) v Tunbridge Wells BC & Ors. [2020] EWHC 3019 Admin) at [138]
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Wigan
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Dismissed25 September 202660080263 Kimberley Street, Wigan, WN6 7AJ
- Dismissed21 September 2026600897790 Park Road, Wigan, WN6 7AQ
- Dismissed24 July 202660057271 Eccleston Street, Wigan, WN1 2AY
- Dismissed3 June 20266004822Land to the Rear of 166 Booths Brow Road, Ashton in Makerfield, Wigan, WN4 0NG
- Dismissed3 June 20266004698Land East of Bramblemead, Bramblemead, Leigh, WN7 5GH
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®