Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed3 June 20266004822

Land to the rear of 166 Booths Brow Road, Ashton in Makerfield, Wigan, WN4 0NG

full planning application including reserved matters for the erection of a single storey detached dwelling, seeking approval of access, appearance, landscaping, layout and scale

Authority
Wigan
Appeal type
Planning
Procedure
Written
Development
residential
Postcode
WN4 0NG

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt
  • the effect of the proposed development on the openness and purposes of the Green Belt
  • whether the proposed development meets statutory biodiversity net gain objectives
  • if the development is inappropriate, whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development

What decided it

The proposal constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt that causes moderate harm to openness and countryside safeguarding, combined with failure to provide the statutory biodiversity metric, and these harms are not clearly outweighed by the limited benefits of one additional dwelling and short-term economic gains.

The benefits of housing delivery and economic benefits were outweighed by the substantial harm from inappropriateness in the Green Belt, moderate harm to openness and countryside safeguarding, and the significant harm arising from failure to meet statutory biodiversity net gain information requirements.

Framework references: 11, 142, 143, 153, 154, 155, 73

Plan policies cited: Policy JP-G9, Policy JP-G8

Judgments cited: Julian Wood v SSCLG, Gravesham Borough Council [2015] EWVA Civ 195

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.