Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed17 February 20233308036

28 Wanderer Drive, Barking, IG11 0XJ

Planning appeal 3308036 at 28 Wanderer Drive, Barking, IG11 0XJ (London Borough of Barking and Dagenham Council) was dismissed on 17 February 2023 by Inspector Allen K, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the host property and the area.

loft conversion with rear dormer

Authority
London Borough of Barking and Dagenham Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Allen K
Postcode
IG11 0XJ

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the development on the character and appearance of the host property and the area

What decided it

The proposed dormer would be disproportionate in scale, dominating the roof and harming the character and appearance of the host property and the area, in conflict with development plan policies and the Framework.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy D4 of The London Plan (March 2021)Policy CP3 of the Planning for the Future of Barking and Dagenham Core Strategy (July 2010)Policy BP8 of the Planning for the Future of Barking and Dagenham Borough Wide Development Policies Development Plan Document (March 2011)Policy BP11 of the Planning for the Future of Barking and Dagenham Borough Wide Development Policies Development Plan Document (March 2011)Policy SP2 of the Draft Local Plan 2037Policy DMD1 of the Draft Local Plan 2037Policy DMD6 of the Draft Local Plan 2037
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 48

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

147 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Barking and Dagenham Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023

  1. Dismissed17 February 20266003133
    137 Armstead Walk, Dagenham, RM10 9PD
  2. Dismissed16 June 20253358769
    45 Bevan Avenue, Barking, IG11 9NW
  3. Dismissed12 June 20253356502
    138 Bradfield Drive, Barking, IG11 9AS
  4. Dismissed9 October 20233321608
    16 Marston Avenue, Dagenham, RM10 7JX
  5. Allowed6 March 20233308125
    24 Lynett Road, Dagenham, RM8 1RL

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.