Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed21 June 20233308919

Land at Station Works, Station Road, Tisbury, Wiltshire, SP3 6QU

Planning appeal 3308919 at Land at Station Works, Station Road, Tisbury, Wiltshire, SP3 6QU (Wiltshire Council) was dismissed on 21 June 2023 by Inspector Woodwards O, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether or not the proposed land use is acceptable, with particular regard to the principle of the proposed loss of the existing commercial/industrial land uses and replacement with housing and a care home, including considering the need for a care home.

redevelopment of the Station Works site to provide a mixed development of up to 86 dwellings, a care home of up to 40 bedspaces with associated medical facilities, new pedestrian and vehicular access and traffic management works, a safeguarded area for any future rail improvements, and areas of public open space

Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Inquiry
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
Woodwards O
Postcode
SP3 6QU

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether or not the proposed land use is acceptable, with particular regard to the principle of the proposed loss of the existing commercial/industrial land uses and replacement with housing and a care home, including considering the need for a care home
  • whether or not the appeal site is suitably accessible, with particular regard to providing adequate access to services and facilities including in the event of flooding
  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, including whether or not it would conserve or enhance the landscape and scenic beauty of the Cranborne Chase Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty
  • whether or not the proposal would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Tisbury Conservation Area
  • the effect of the proposal on the special architectural and historic interest of listed buildings, St John the Baptist and Gaston Manor
  • the effect of the proposal on highway safety
  • the effect of the proposal on the efficient operation of the highway network in the vicinity of the appeal site
  • the effect of the proposal on healthcare

What decided it

The proposed walkway under the Three Arch Bridge would not remain safe and operational for users during design flood events, isolating future occupants from services and the railway station and failing the Framework's exception test for essential infrastructure in Flood Zone 3b.

The weighty benefits of housing delivery, affordable housing, care home provision, economic benefits, regeneration of an 'eyesore' site and biodiversity net gain were negated by the unresolved flood risk and accessibility failure of the walkway, which breached the site allocation and other development plan policies; the tilted balance did not apply because this constituted a clear reason for refusal, and the proposal was found to conflict with the development plan as a whole.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CP43Policy CP46Policy CP27Policy CP35Policy CP52Policy CP57Policy CP3Policy CP60Policy CP61Policy CP62Policy BL.7Policy BL.1Policy BL.3Policy EB.1Saved Policy R2
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 57Paragraph 110Paragraph 112Paragraph 119Paragraph 166Paragraph 167Paragraph 174Paragraph 177Paragraph 197

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

4 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Wiltshire

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023

  1. Allowed30 September 20266007924
    Beehive Cottage, Portway, Salisbury, SP4 6BL
  2. Dismissed30 September 20266007352
    Land to the East of New Road, Melksham, SN12 7QZ
  3. Allowed23 June 20266006895
    Poles Farm, Swallowcliffe, Salisbury, SP3 5NX
  4. Allowed17 June 20266003895
    86-87 Kington St Michael, Kington St Michael, SN14 6HX
  5. Allowed15 June 20263373278
    Land South of Snarlton Farm, Snarlton Lane, Melksham, Wiltshire, SN12 7QP

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.