Planning appeal decision
Land East of Lodge Road, Hurst, RG10 0DN
Planning appeal 3309202 at Land East of Lodge Road, Hurst, RG10 0DN (Wokingham Borough Council) was dismissed on 9 March 2023 by Inspector Wildsmith D, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The extent to which the proposed development would be consistent with the development plan for the area, and the weight to be given to relevant policies.
approximately 200 homes, open space, pedestrian and cycle links, recreational facilities (Class E) and other associated infrastructure including the formation of a new highway access road from Lodge Road located adjacent to the existing field access to be closed
- Authority
- Wokingham Borough Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Wildsmith D
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The extent to which the proposed development would be consistent with the development plan for the area, and the weight to be given to relevant policies
- The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the appeal site and the surrounding area, in landscape and visual terms
- The effect on trees and hedgerows
- The effect on BMV agricultural land
- Whether the appeal site represents a sustainable location
- The effect of the proposed development in terms of highway safety
- Whether the submitted planning obligations would satisfactorily address the impact of the proposed development
What decided it
The proposal's conflict with the Council's adopted spatial vision and settlement hierarchy, reinforced by landscape harm, unsustainable location and uncertain BNG mitigation, meant the adverse impacts significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits.
The adverse impacts of the proposal—substantial harm from conflict with the development plan's spatial vision, moderate landscape/visual harm, modest harm from loss of BMV land, and uncertainty over BNG mitigation—significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits of housing delivery and other advantages, so the tilted balance favoured refusal.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- CS Policy CP1CS Policy CP2CS Policy CP3CS Policy CP6CS Policy CP7CS Policy CP9CS Policy CP11CS Policy CP17MDDLP Policy CC01MDDLP Policy CC02MDDLP Policy CC03MDDLP Policy TB21MDDLP Policy TB23Replacement Minerals Local Plan for Berkshire Policy 2
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 8Paragraph 11Paragraph 57Paragraph 60Paragraph 104Paragraph 105Paragraph 167Paragraph 174Paragraph 219
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Wokingham Borough Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Dismissed2 October 20266011060West Court Land, Park Lane, Finchampstead, Wokingham, RG40 4QF
- Dismissed1 October 20266011062Thamesfield Retirement Village, Wargrave Road, Remenham, RG9 2LX
- Dismissed14 September 202660131329 Tamworth Close, Earley, Wokingham, RG6 4EQ
- Dismissed6 August 20266005646Land West of Edney's Hill, Barkham Road, Barkham, RG41 4TG
- Dismissed24 July 2026600819444 Proctors Road, Wokingham, RG40 1RP
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®