Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed11 September 20233309224

Harestone Drive, Caterham, Surrey, CR3 6YQ

the erection of two detached 2 storey dwelling houses, with attached garages, associated parking and landscaping, accessed from a newly formed cul-de-sac extended north west from Planning

Authority
Tandridge District Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Hobbs J

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
  • whether the proposed development would lead to the loss of a site that has the potential to be used as open space or as a community facility
  • whether the proposed development would result in appropriate parking provision for the residents of the Woodland Court Development

What decided it

The significant harm caused to the character and appearance of the area by the loss of garden land that provides an important setting to Woodland Court significantly and demonstrably outweighs the moderate benefits of the scheme, such that the presumption in favour of sustainable development does not apply.

The moderate benefits of the scheme (accessible location, efficient use of land, provision of two houses, sustainability features, and economic benefits) are significantly and demonstrably outweighed by the significant harm to character and appearance caused by the loss of garden land that provides an important setting to Woodland Court, a building of character.

Framework references: 11, 38, 47, 69, 86, 119, 120, 124, 126, 130

Plan policies cited: Policy CSP18 of the Tandridge District Core Strategy, October 2008, Policy DP7 of the Tandridge Local Plan Part 2: Detailed Policies 2014-2029, July 2014, Policy CCW1 of the Caterham, Chaldon and Whyteleafe Neighbourhood Plan 2018 to 2033, June 2021, Policy CSP 13 of the Tandridge District Core Strategy, Tandridge Parking Standards SPD, September 2012

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.