Planning appeal decision
Harestone Drive, Caterham, Surrey, CR3 6YQ
Planning appeal 3309224 at Harestone Drive, Caterham, Surrey, CR3 6YQ (Tandridge District Council) was dismissed on 11 September 2023 by Inspector Hobbs J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area.
the erection of two detached 2 storey dwelling houses, with attached garages, associated parking and landscaping, accessed from a newly formed cul-de-sac extended north west from Planning
- Authority
- Tandridge District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Hobbs J
- Postcode
- CR3 6YQ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
- whether the proposed development would lead to the loss of a site that has the potential to be used as open space or as a community facility
- whether the proposed development would result in appropriate parking provision for the residents of the Woodland Court Development
What decided it
The significant harm caused to the character and appearance of the area by the loss of garden land that provides an important setting to Woodland Court significantly and demonstrably outweighs the moderate benefits of the scheme, such that the presumption in favour of sustainable development does not apply.
The moderate benefits of the scheme (accessible location, efficient use of land, provision of two houses, sustainability features, and economic benefits) are significantly and demonstrably outweighed by the significant harm to character and appearance caused by the loss of garden land that provides an important setting to Woodland Court, a building of character.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy CSP18 of the Tandridge District Core Strategy, October 2008Policy DP7 of the Tandridge Local Plan Part 2: Detailed Policies 2014-2029, July 2014Policy CCW1 of the Caterham, Chaldon and Whyteleafe Neighbourhood Plan 2018 to 2033, June 2021Policy CSP 13 of the Tandridge District Core StrategyTandridge Parking Standards SPD, September 2012
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 38Paragraph 47Paragraph 69Paragraph 86Paragraph 119Paragraph 120Paragraph 124Paragraph 126Paragraph 130
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Tandridge District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Dismissed26 October 2026601413931a Banstead Road, Caterham, CR3 5QH
- Allowed25 September 20266006497Land at Mount Avenue, Chaldon, CR3 5BB
- Dismissed23 September 20266008688Land Adjacent to Farm View Cottage, Lingfield Road, East Grinstead, RH19 2JW
- Allowed13 July 20266002345Land Adjacent to Heathview, Eastbourne Road, Blindley Heath, RH7 6LG
- Allowed13 July 20266002255Winnies Woodland, Eastbourne Road, Blindley Heath, Lingfield, RH7 6LG
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®