Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice varied and upheld9 May 20243309707

18 Cranhurst Road, LONDON, NW2 4LN

Without planning permission, the material change of use of the premises to a House in Multiple Occupation (HMO) and one flat. ("the unauthorised change of use") AND Without planning permission, the erection of an outbuilding in the rear garden of the premises. ("the unauthorised development")

Authority
London Borough of Brent
Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Douglas L

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the MCU on the provision of family size accommodation within the borough
  • Whether the MCU provides acceptable living conditions for occupants of the house, with particular regard to internal and external space, and noise and disturbance
  • The effect of the MCU on the character and appearance of the area and the living conditions of neighbouring residents, with particular regard to noise and disturbance, refuse and bicycle storage facilities, and on-street parking provision
  • The effect of the outbuilding on the character and appearance of the area and the living conditions of neighbouring residents, with particular regard to outlook

What decided it

The material change of use resulted in unacceptable living conditions for occupants and loss of family size accommodation contrary to the development plan, whereas the outbuilding caused no planning harm and was therefore permitted.

Plan policies cited: Policy BH11, Policy DMP1, Policy BH7, Policy BH13, Policy D6, Policy T5, Policy BT2, Policy T6.1, Policy BH10, Policy BH12

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.