Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed11 January 20233309979

Stainbeck Road, Meanwood, Leeds, LS6 2WB

proposed telecommunications installation: proposed 15.0m Phase 8 Monopole C/W wrapround Cabinet at base and associated ancillary works

Authority
Leeds City Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
telecoms · Other minor developments
Inspector
Veevers A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the siting and appearance of the proposed installation on the living conditions of nearby residential occupiers, particularly Nos. 36 and 38 Meanwood Valley Drive, with regards to outlook
  • The effect of the siting and appearance of the proposed installation on the character and appearance of the area
  • Whether any harm caused is outweighed by the need for the installation to be sited in the proposed location, having regard to the potential availability of alternative sites

What decided it

The significant harm to the outlook and living conditions of occupiers at Nos. 36 and 38 Meanwood Valley Drive, combined with insufficient evidence that alternative sites had been properly evaluated, outweighed the benefits of the proposal.

Framework references: 115, 117

Plan policies cited: Policy GP5 of the Leeds Unitary Development Plan (Review 2006), Policy P10 of the Core Strategy (amended 2019)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.