Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed11 May 20266005685

(A) Area of Pavement to Outgang Lane, Bramley, Leeds, Yorkshire, LS13 2RB

Planning appeal 6005685 at (A) Area of Pavement to Outgang Lane, Bramley, Leeds, Yorkshire, LS13 2RB (Leeds City Council) was dismissed on 11 May 2026 by Inspector Caines A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the siting and appearance of the proposed telecommunications installation on pedestrian accessibility and convenience.

20 metre high streetworks pole with built in cabinet, 9no. radio antennas, 2no. small transmission dishes and associated cabinets

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
telecoms · Other minor developments
Inspector
Caines A
Postcode
LS13 2RB

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the siting and appearance of the proposed telecommunications installation on pedestrian accessibility and convenience
  • the effect of the siting and appearance of the proposed telecommunications installation on the character and appearance of the area
  • whether any harm would be outweighed by the need for the installation to be sited as proposed, taking into account any suitable alternatives

What decided it

The unacceptable impact on pedestrian accessibility and convenience at a well-used location with concentrated pedestrian activity, combined with insufficient evidence that the specific siting was necessary and that no less harmful alternatives existed.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy T2 of the Leeds Core Strategy (Selective Review 2019)saved Policy GP5 of the Leeds Unitary Development Plan (Review 2006)Policies P10 and P12 of the Core Strategy

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

44 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Leeds City Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2026

  1. Allowed3 December 20253374102
    Pavement on Stainbeck Lane, Horsforth, Leeds , West Yorkshire, LS7 2PS
  2. Allowed4 August 20253365964
    Pontefract Lane , Leeds , LS9 8HY
  3. Dismissed18 June 20253356494
    Stainbeck Lane, Chapel Allerton, Leeds, LS7 2EB
  4. Allowed27 May 20253362138
    Cranmer Bank, Moor Allerton, Leeds, LS17 5HX
  5. Dismissed23 May 20253357929
    Pavement on East Moor Lane and Sir George Martin Drive, Adel, Leeds, LS16 8LA

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.