Planning appeal decision
Victoria Fields , Clay Lane , Newchapel , Surrey, RH7 6HX
Planning appeal 3310584 at Victoria Fields , Clay Lane , Newchapel , Surrey, RH7 6HX (Tandridge District Council) was dismissed on 28 June 2023 by Inspector Allen M, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the intended occupiers benefit from status as gypsy travellers.
Proposed use of land as a private gypsy and traveller caravan site consisting of 1 pitch; revised application further to TA/2021/102 - Erection of a chalet bungalow and permission 2012/846 for stable / tack room / hardstanding
- Authority
- Tandridge District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- caravan-gypsy · Minor traveller and caravan pitches
- Inspector
- Allen M
- Postcode
- RH7 6HX
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the intended occupiers benefit from status as gypsy travellers
- The effect on the openness and purposes of the Green Belt
- The effect on the character and appearance of the area
- Whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the development
What decided it
The substantial harm to the Green Belt combined with significant harm to the character and appearance of the area was not clearly outweighed by the identified need, lack of alternative sites, personal circumstances or the best interests of the child, so very special circumstances were not made out.
The considerable weight attached to the Green Belt harm (substantial) and harm to character and appearance (significant) was not clearly outweighed by the significant weight given to the need for and undersupply of pitches and the failure of policy, together with the personal circumstances of the appellant and the best interests of the child, so the balance fell against the proposal.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- CSP9CSP18DP7DP10
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 138
- Judgments
- Smith judgement
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Tandridge District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Allowed29 October 20266006369Land at Thornhill, Westerham Road, Limpsfield, Oxted, RH8 0ED
- Dismissed14 October 20266008351Development Site West of Southwood, Waller Lane, Caterham, CR3 5EA
- Dismissed13 October 20266007518Rosemary Cottage, Smallfield Road, Horne, Horley, RH6 9JP
- Dismissed23 September 20266008688Land Adjacent to Farm View Cottage, Lingfield Road, East Grinstead, RH19 2JW
- Dismissed22 September 20266011736Land Adjacent to Oaklands Drive, Copthorne Bank, Copthorne, RH10 3JD
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®