Planning appeal decision
40 Rylett Road, LONDON, W12 9ST
the construction of a single-storey side extension, including alterations to the boundary wall
- Authority
- London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham
- Appeal type
- householder · Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Poole S
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the host property
- Whether it would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Ravenscourt and Starch Green Conservation Area
What decided it
The proposal would be an incongruous addition that would harm the appearance of the host property and fail to preserve the character and appearance of the conservation area, with no public benefits to outweigh the less than substantial harm.
Framework references: 202
Plan policies cited: Policy DC1, Policy DC4, Policy DC8, Key Principle CAG3
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®