Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed22 February 20233310627

40 Rylett Road, LONDON, W12 9ST

the construction of a single-storey side extension, including alterations to the boundary wall

Authority
London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Poole S

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the host property
  • Whether it would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Ravenscourt and Starch Green Conservation Area

What decided it

The proposal would be an incongruous addition that would harm the appearance of the host property and fail to preserve the character and appearance of the conservation area, with no public benefits to outweigh the less than substantial harm.

Framework references: 202

Plan policies cited: Policy DC1, Policy DC4, Policy DC8, Key Principle CAG3

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.