Planning appeal decision
Land East of Manor Trading Estate, Benfleet, Essex, SS7 4PS
Planning appeal 3310794 at Land East of Manor Trading Estate, Benfleet, Essex, SS7 4PS (Castle Point Borough Council) was dismissed on 9 May 2023 by Inspector Clark P, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effects of the proposal on the openness and purposes of the Green Belt.
68 residential units, three Class E (commercial, business and service) units, one B2 (general industrial) unit and two B8 (storage and distribution) units with associated access, parking, amenity space, strategic landscaping and noise attenuation, restoration and improvement of existing estate roads and infrastructure
- Authority
- Castle Point Borough Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Clark P
- Postcode
- SS7 4PS
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effects of the proposal on the openness and purposes of the Green Belt.
- The effects of the proposal on safeguarded waste disposal sites within the adjoining Manor Trading Estate.
- The effects on the proposal of noise from the Manor Trading Estate.
- The effects of the proposal on the supply of and demand for parking for non-residential uses.
- Whether there is an adequate supply of housing land in the area.
- Whether there is an adequate supply of employment land in the area.
- Whether any harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal.
What decided it
The combination of Green Belt harm (to which substantial weight was attached) and the unresolved noise harm to future residents' living conditions was not clearly outweighed by the housing, affordable housing and other benefits, so very special circumstances were not demonstrated.
The harm to the Green Belt (moderate to openness, limited to purposes, given substantial weight) combined with harm to living conditions from noise was not clearly outweighed by the substantial-weight benefits of housing and affordable housing delivery, even supplemented by limited employment land, environmental improvement and biodiversity net gain benefits, so the appeal was dismissed.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy GB1policy 2policy T8policy H7policy ED7Strategic Policy EC1
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 149Paragraph 150Paragraph 138Paragraph 148Paragraph 187Paragraph 130Paragraph 185
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Castle Point
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Dismissed6 October 202660095891 Mount Zion, Castle Lane, Hadleigh, SS7 2AR
- Allowed14 September 20266007184Land South Of Daws Heath Road, Thundersley, SS7 2TA
- Notice varied and upheld4 September 20263350293The Hideaway, 23A Malyon Court Close, Benfleet, Essex, SS7 1TX
- Allowed24 August 2026600854222 Woodside View, Benfleet, SS7 4PB
- Dismissed8 June 20266005397Land Rear of 60 Church Road, Benfleet, SS7 4BP
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®