Planning appeal decision
Land to the South of 86 Chrishall Road, Fowlmere, SG8 7RT
Planning appeal 3311183 at Land to the South of 86 Chrishall Road, Fowlmere, SG8 7RT (South Cambridgeshire District Council) was dismissed on 5 June 2024 by Inspector Nicholls H, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether there would be any conflict between the scheme and an existing planning obligation relating to part of the appeal site.
outline planning application for 15 No. self-build dwellings, with details pursuant to access and layout, and all other matters including appearance, scale and landscaping reserved for subsequent approval
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Nicholls H
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether there would be any conflict between the scheme and an existing planning obligation relating to part of the appeal site
- whether the location and nature of development would accord with local planning policies outlining the spatial distribution and requirements for housing growth in the plan area
- whether the site is a sustainable location
- the effects on the rural character and appearance of the area
- the effects of the proposal on Grades 2 and 3a agricultural land
- whether the scheme would be provided with a satisfactory means of drainage to avoid increased risks of surface water flooding elsewhere
- whether permission should be granted having regard to the duty set out in sections 2 and 2A of the Self Build and Custom Housebuilding Act 2015 (as amended) (Self Build Act), having regard to demand and supply considerations
- whether or not financial contributions can be secured from a scheme for self/custom build housing
What decided it
The substantial conflict with the development plan's spatial strategy, combined with substantial harm to rural character and appearance and loss of best and most versatile agricultural land, outweighed the benefits of self-build housing delivery.
the identified harms (conflict with the spatial strategy, substantial harm to rural character and appearance, and loss of best and most versatile agricultural land) outweighed the public benefits (self-build housing delivery, biodiversity net gain, sustainability credentials and economic benefits), so the balance tipped against the proposal
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy S/2Policy S/6Policy S/7Policy S/10Policy H/11Policy TI/2Policy HQ/1Policy NH/2Policy NH/3Policy H/9Policy H/10Policy TI/8Policy SC/4Policy SC/6Policy SC/7Policy NH/6Policy CC/8Policy CC/9
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 70Paragraph 11
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in South Cambridgeshire
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Allowed23 October 20266005101Land North of Pampisford Road, Great Abington, Cambridge, CB21 6AH
- Dismissed19 October 20266010417Land to Rear of No.9 Brewery Lane, Meldreth, Royston, SG8 6NS
- Dismissed19 October 2026600863119 Church Street, Steeple Morden, SG8 0NJ
- Dismissed16 October 20266011793Land to the Rear of Queen Adelaide PH, High Street, Croydon, SG8 0DT
- Dismissed2 October 20266011365Land Adjacent to North Grove, Long Lane, Fowlmere, SG8 7TG
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®