Planning appeal decision
Land Adjacent And To The Rear Of 52, Harris Lane , Shenley, WD7 9EG
Planning appeal 3311193 at Land Adjacent And To The Rear Of 52, Harris Lane , Shenley, WD7 9EG (Hertsmere Borough Council) was dismissed on 25 May 2023 by Inspector Woodward M, following an inquiry. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt and its purposes.
construction of up to 37 dwellings with associated landscaping and open space to include access from Harris Lane (Outline application with appearance, landscaping, layout and scale reserved)
- Authority
- Hertsmere Borough Council
- Appeal type
- other · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Inquiry
- Development
- residential · Unknown
- Inspector
- Woodward M
- Postcode
- WD7 9EG
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt and its purposes
- The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
- The scheme's compatibility with existing businesses, with particular regard to potential noise impacts
- Whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm (if found), would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal
What decided it
The cumulative benefits of the scheme, even including the severe housing land supply shortfall, did not clearly outweigh the substantial harm to the Green Belt, so very special circumstances did not exist.
The significant weight given to housing and affordable housing delivery, together with moderate biodiversity gain and limited economic, social and open space benefits, was found not to clearly outweigh the substantial Green Belt harm (inappropriateness, loss of openness and conflict with purpose (c)) and moderate harm to character and appearance, so the balance tipped against the proposal.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy SP1Policy SP2Policy CS13Policy SADM26
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 48Paragraph 68Paragraph 138Paragraph 147Paragraph 148Paragraph 149Paragraph 174Paragraph 187
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Hertsmere
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Allowed17 August 20266008668Stables West Of Green Street, Shenley, WD7 9BA
- Allowed27 July 20266007118Land Rear of 5-23 Cobden Hill, Radlett, WD7 7JL
- Allowed23 March 20263374962Land South of Shenley Hill, Radlett, WD7 7EL
- Allowed16 March 20266003108Glaze Restaurant Land Adj Manor Hotel, Edgwarebury Lane, Elstree, Hertfordshire, WD6 3RE
- Allowed16 January 20263368845Land West Of,Hilfield Lane, Aldenham, Hertfordshire, WD25 8DD
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®