Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed27 July 20266007118

Land Rear of 5-23 Cobden Hill, Radlett, WD7 7JL

construction of 4x 4 bed dwellings and 2x 3 bed dwellings with new vehicular and pedestrian access adjacent No 5 Cobden Hill; layout of additional parking, landscaping and all ancillary works

Authority
Hertsmere
Appeal type
Planning
Procedure
Written
Development
residential
Postcode
WD7 7JL

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposed development would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Radlett South Conservation Area

What decided it

The Council's inability to demonstrate a 5-year housing land supply, combined with the public benefits of housing delivery outweighing the less than substantial harm to the conservation area, engaged the presumption in favour of sustainable development under paragraph 11(d)(ii) of the NPPF.

The less than substantial harm to the character and appearance of the Radlett South Conservation Area, characterised as loss of verdancy, was outweighed by the significant public benefit of contributing to housing supply in the context of a substantial shortfall (0.98 years), together with moderate economic benefits and the sustainable location of the site within the settlement boundary and walking distance to the train station.

Framework references: 11, 58, 212, 213, 215

Plan policies cited: Policy SP1, Policy CS12, Policy CS14, Policy SP2, Policy SADM3, Policy SADM12, Policy SADM29, Policy SADM10, Policy HD3, Policy HD4, Policy HD5, Biodiversity, Trees and Landscape Supplementary Planning Document (2010), The Planning and Design Guide Part D: Guidelines for High Quality Sustainable Development

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.