Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed5 February 20243311458

Seisdon Landfill Site, Ebstree Road, Seisdon, WOLVERHAMPTON, Staffordshire, WV5 7ES

restoration of landfill site to provide up to 49 lodges with associated parking and landscaping

Authority
South Staffordshire District Council
Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
Middleton M

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the policies in the NPPF
  • The effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
  • Whether the proposal contributes to meeting identified affordable housing needs within the area of the local planning authority
  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the local countryside
  • Any other harm
  • Other considerations
  • Other matters
  • If the development is inappropriate, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development within the Green Belt

What decided it

The proposal would cause substantial harm to the openness of the Green Belt from both spatial and visual perspectives, constituting inappropriate development for which the other considerations do not amount to very special circumstances.

The substantial harm to Green Belt openness and inappropriateness of development, together with moderate harm to landscape character and flood risk, were not outweighed by the limited weight afforded to affordable housing provision and other considerations, such that very special circumstances do not exist.

Framework references: 142, 143, 147, 152, 154, 167, 173

Plan policies cited: CP GB1, CP1, CP3, H3, EQ4, EQ12

Judgments cited: Samuel Smith Old Brewery (Tadcaster) & Others v North Yorkshire County Council [2020] 3; England and Wales Court of Appeal [2018] Civ 489

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.