Planning appeal decision
Seisdon Landfill Site, Ebstree Road, Seisdon, Wolverhampton, Staffordshire, WV5 7ES
Planning appeal 3311458 at Seisdon Landfill Site, Ebstree Road, Seisdon, Wolverhampton, Staffordshire, WV5 7ES (South Staffordshire District Council) was dismissed on 5 February 2024 by Inspector Middleton M, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the policies in the NPPF.
restoration of landfill site to provide up to 49 lodges with associated parking and landscaping
- Authority
- South Staffordshire District Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Middleton M
- Postcode
- WV5 7ES
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the policies in the NPPF
- The effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
- Whether the proposal contributes to meeting identified affordable housing needs within the area of the local planning authority
- The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the local countryside
- Any other harm
- Other considerations
- Other matters
- If the development is inappropriate, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development within the Green Belt
What decided it
The proposal would cause substantial harm to the openness of the Green Belt from both spatial and visual perspectives, constituting inappropriate development for which the other considerations do not amount to very special circumstances.
The substantial harm to Green Belt openness and inappropriateness of development, together with moderate harm to landscape character and flood risk, were not outweighed by the limited weight afforded to affordable housing provision and other considerations, such that very special circumstances do not exist.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- CP GB1CP1CP3H3EQ4EQ12
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 142Paragraph 143Paragraph 147Paragraph 152Paragraph 154Paragraph 167Paragraph 173
- Judgments
- Samuel Smith Old Brewery (Tadcaster) & Others v North Yorkshire County Council [2020] 3; England and Wales Court of Appeal [2018] Civ 489
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in South Staffordshire District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2024
- Dismissed21 October 20266012641The Granary, Lyne Hill Lane, Penkridge, ST19 5NT
- Allowed25 September 20266010537Land to the Rear of 6-12 Long Lane, Newtown, Wolverhampton, WS6 6AU
- Dismissed23 September 20266008866The Paddocks, Bridgnorth Road, Stourton, DY7 6QZ
- Dismissed12 August 20266010048Hilton Colliery Farm Cottage, Red Lane, Essington, WV11 2RD
- Dismissed15 July 20266007394White Lodge, Old Stafford Road, Slade Heath, WV10 7PH
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®