Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed13 July 20233311669

30 Mitcham Lane, London, SW16 6NW

Planning appeal 3311669 at 30 Mitcham Lane, London, SW16 6NW (London Borough of Lambeth) was dismissed on 13 July 2023 by Inspector Law T, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposed development would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Streatham High Road and Streatham Hill Conservation Area.

Forming first & second floor additions & developing the existing ground floor, to add an additional 2 bed, self-contained flat, & an additional office. Development to include associated bin store, bike store & recycling store

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Law T
Postcode
SW16 6NW

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposed development would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Streatham High Road and Streatham Hill Conservation Area
  • Whether the proposed development would provide acceptable living conditions for future residents, with particular reference to internal and private amenity space
  • The effect of the proposed development on highway safety with particular regard to car parking

What decided it

The proposed development would fail to preserve or enhance the conservation area's character and would provide unacceptable living conditions for future residents due to inadequate ceiling height and absence of private amenity space.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy Q5Policy Q8Policy Q11Policy Q22Policy H5London Plan Policy D6
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 199Paragraph 202Paragraph 130

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

427 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Lambeth

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023

  1. Dismissed16 October 20266009699
    28 Amesbury Avenue, Lambeth, London, SW2 3AA
  2. Dismissed9 September 20266007861
    The Park, 56 Elder Road, West Norwood, London, SE27 9ND
  3. Dismissed11 August 20266009353
    62A Upper Tulse Hill, London, SW2 2RW
  4. Dismissed23 July 20266005770
    Pavement O/S 44 Clapham High Street, London, SW4 7UR
  5. Dismissed23 July 20266005768
    Pavement O/S 44 Clapham High Street, London, SW4 7UR

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.