Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed29 August 20233311771

96 Tavistock Crescent, MITCHAM, CR4 1QG

demolition of existing garage in the rear garden and construction of a new 1 bedroom (studio) self-contained dwelling

Authority
London Borough of Merton
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Moulton E

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • The effect of the proposal on the living conditions of neighbouring occupants, with particular regard to outlook and privacy
  • Whether adequate living conditions of future occupants would be provided, with particular regard to ceiling height and private amenity space
  • Whether the proposal would comply with sustainable construction requirements
  • Whether the proposal makes adequate provision for waste and recycling storage and collection facilities

What decided it

The unacceptable harm to character and appearance, combined with breaches of living condition standards for both neighbours and future occupants, significantly and demonstrably outweighed the modest housing benefit.

Framework references: 11

Plan policies cited: Policy DMD2, Policy D3, Policy D4, Policy CS14, Policy D6, Policy CS15, Policy SI5, Policy SI2, Policy SI7, Policy CS17

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.