Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed25 April 20233311966

Former Garage Block, Charlecott Close, Moseley, Birmingham, B13 0DE

demolition of existing garage block and erection of ten No. 2-bed apartments in two part 2-storey and part 3-storey blocks with vehicle and cycle parking and associated works

Authority
Birmingham City Council
Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
Law T

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
  • The effect of the proposed development on the living condition of nearby residents
  • Whether the proposed development would provide acceptable living conditions for future residents with regards to the amount of floorspace and outlook
  • The effect of the proposed development on highway safety with specific regard to parking provision

What decided it

The unacceptable harm to the character and appearance of the area and the overbearing effect on the outlook of neighbouring residents, which significantly and demonstrably outweigh the limited housing benefits in circumstances where the development plan is out of date.

The adverse impacts of granting planning permission, comprising significant harm to character and appearance and living conditions of neighbours, significantly and demonstrably outweigh the limited housing benefits of ten flats, such that the proposal is not sustainable development and the presumption in favour does not apply

Framework references: 11, 130, 111

Plan policies cited: Policy PG3, Policy TP27, Policy TP30, Policy DM2, Policy DM10, Policy DM14, Policy DM15

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.