Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed22 February 20233312032

23 Ennerdale Road , London, TW9 3PE

the erection of side extensions at ground and first floor level

Authority
Richmond Upon Thames London Borough Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Poole S

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the host property
  • Whether it would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Kew Gardens Conservation Area

What decided it

The rear extension elements, by virtue of their siting, height, form and flat roof appearance, would result in an overly dominant and incongruous form that fails to preserve the character and appearance of the conservation area and host property, with no public benefits to justify the harm.

Framework references: 202

Plan policies cited: Policy LP1, Policy LP3, Policy LP4

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.