Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice varied and upheld12 March 20253312263

Longchamps (Also Known As Gracie's Field), Latimer Road, Chenies, Buckinghamshire, WD3 6EY

Planning appeal 3312263 at Longchamps (Also Known As Gracie's Field), Latimer Road, Chenies, Buckinghamshire, WD3 6EY (Buckinghamshire Council - Chiltern Area *) was allowed in part (a split decision) on 12 March 2025 by Inspector Boffin D, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the alleged breach of planning control on the natural environment and biodiversity, in particular the River Chess, the BOA, the SSSIs, Priority Habitats, Local Wildlife Site and Ancient Woodland.

Appeal A: erection of two egg production units, stationing of two feed silos, laying of hardstanding, widening of a vehicular access and associated engineering operations (unauthorised); Appeal B: material change of use of land to a mixed use of equestrian, agricultural and residential by stationing of a mobile home for residential habitation (unauthorised)

Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Hearing
Development
agricultural · Other Major Developments
Inspector
Boffin D
Postcode
WD3 6EY

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the alleged breach of planning control on the natural environment and biodiversity, in particular the River Chess, the BOA, the SSSIs, Priority Habitats, Local Wildlife Site and Ancient Woodland
  • The effect of the alleged breach of planning control on the character and appearance of the surrounding area taking into account the Chilterns National Landscape and the CLCA
  • The effect of the alleged breach of planning control on a defined groundwater Source Protection Zone (SPZ)
  • Whether the development constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the development plan and the Framework
  • The effect of the development on the openness and purposes of the Green Belt
  • The effect of the alleged breach of planning control on the character and appearance of the surrounding area taking into account the Chilterns National Landscape and the CLCA
  • Whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations, and if so, whether this amounts to the very special circumstances required to justify the development

What decided it

The Inspector's finding that the harm to biodiversity, water quality and heritage/landscape from the poultry enclosure (Appeal A), and the Green Belt inappropriateness and harm to openness from the mobile home (Appeal B), were not outweighed by the benefits or other considerations advanced.

Appeal A: appreciable public benefits (employment, egg production, access safety, manure management) did not outweigh the policy conflicts and less than substantial heritage harm; Appeal B: modest other considerations did not clearly outweigh the substantial Green Belt harm, so very special circumstances were not established.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
LP Policy GC9LP Policy GC12LP Policy NC1CS Policy CS4CS Policy CS22CS Policy CS24LP Policy LSQ1LP Policy CA2LP Policy GB2LP Policy GB17MP Policy DP1MP Policy DP2
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 232Paragraph 213Paragraph 215Paragraph 142Paragraph 143Paragraph 154Paragraph 155Paragraph 153Paragraph 189Paragraph 58Paragraph 150
Judgments
Skerritts of Nottingham Ltd v SSETR (no. 2) [2000] 2 PLR 102; R (Save Woolley Valley Action Group Ltd) v Bath and North East Somerset Council [2012] EWHC 2161 (Admin)

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

38 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Buckinghamshire Council - Chiltern Area

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2025

  1. Notice upheld23 April 20263377177
    Land Adjacent Porch House, Village Road, Coleshill, Buckinghamshire
  2. Dismissed1 April 20263372329
    118 Chalfont Road, Seer Green, Beaconsfield, HP9 2QP
  3. Dismissed17 March 20263366471
    Land at Rear Of Former Landrecies, , Oxford Road (Off Fulmer Lane), Gerrards Cross, Buckinghamshire, SL9 7AT
  4. Notice varied and upheld12 March 20263325136
    Fenton Civil Engineering Ltd, Rowan Tree Farm Blackwell Hall Lane, Ley Hill, Chesham, HP5 1UN
  5. Quashed On Legal Grounds9 March 20263341531
    Lodge Farm , 100 Lodge Lane, Chalfont St. Giles, HP8 4AH

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.