Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed24 October 20233312704

Land at Grittenham, Chippenham, SN15 4JY

the change of use of land to private Gypsy site and 2 no stables

Authority
Wiltshire Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Hearing
Development
caravan-gypsy · Change of use
Inspector
Pipkin R

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
  • whether the proposal would preserve the setting of nearby Grade II listed buildings
  • whether the proposal would provide satisfactory living conditions for future occupants, with regard to noise and disturbance
  • whether the appeal site is a suitable location for the proposed development, having regard to the effect of the proposed additional Gypsy/traveller site, in combination with existing sites, on the settled community
  • whether the appeal site is in a suitable location for the proposed development, having regard to access to services and facilities
  • whether there are any material considerations which mean that the decision should be made otherwise than in accordance with the development plan

What decided it

The cumulative harm to the character and appearance of the countryside, to the setting of nearby listed buildings, and to future occupants' living conditions from noise outweighed the benefits of pitch provision and the appellant's personal circumstances.

The significant harm to character and appearance, the less than substantial harm to heritage assets, and the unsatisfactory living conditions outweighed the benefits of a modest contribution to pitch supply, the absence of alternative sites, and personal circumstances, so the balance tipped against granting permission.

Framework references: 174, 202

Plan policies cited: Policy 47 (vi), Policy 47 (viii), Policy 51 (ii), Policy 51 (vi), Policy 57 (i), Policy 57 (ii), Policy 57 (vi), Policy 57 (xii), Policy CS47 (v), Policy CP47 (v), Policy 60, Policy 61

Judgments cited: R (on the application of Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council) v First Secretary of State and another [2007] EWHC 1034 (Admin); Rafferty and Jones v SSCLG and North Somerset [2009] EWCA Civ 809

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.