Planning appeal decision
Land at Grittenham, Chippenham, SN15 4JY
Planning appeal 3312704 at Land at Grittenham, Chippenham, SN15 4JY (Wiltshire Council) was dismissed on 24 October 2023 by Inspector Pipkin R, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area.
the change of use of land to private Gypsy site and 2 no stables
- Authority
- Wiltshire Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- caravan-gypsy · Change of use
- Inspector
- Pipkin R
- Postcode
- SN15 4JY
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
- whether the proposal would preserve the setting of nearby Grade II listed buildings
- whether the proposal would provide satisfactory living conditions for future occupants, with regard to noise and disturbance
- whether the appeal site is a suitable location for the proposed development, having regard to the effect of the proposed additional Gypsy/traveller site, in combination with existing sites, on the settled community
- whether the appeal site is in a suitable location for the proposed development, having regard to access to services and facilities
- whether there are any material considerations which mean that the decision should be made otherwise than in accordance with the development plan
What decided it
The cumulative harm to the character and appearance of the countryside, to the setting of nearby listed buildings, and to future occupants' living conditions from noise outweighed the benefits of pitch provision and the appellant's personal circumstances.
The significant harm to character and appearance, the less than substantial harm to heritage assets, and the unsatisfactory living conditions outweighed the benefits of a modest contribution to pitch supply, the absence of alternative sites, and personal circumstances, so the balance tipped against granting permission.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy 47 (vi)Policy 47 (viii)Policy 51 (ii)Policy 51 (vi)Policy 57 (i)Policy 57 (ii)Policy 57 (vi)Policy 57 (xii)Policy CS47 (v)Policy CP47 (v)Policy 60Policy 61
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 174Paragraph 202
- Judgments
- R (on the application of Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council) v First Secretary of State and another [2007] EWHC 1034 (Admin); Rafferty and Jones v SSCLG and North Somerset [2009] EWCA Civ 809
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Wiltshire
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Allowed30 September 20266007924Beehive Cottage, Portway, Salisbury, SP4 6BL
- Dismissed13 July 20266002635Castle View Care Centre, 8 Old Castle Road, Salisbury, Wiltshire, SP1 3SF
- Allowed23 June 20266006895Poles Farm, Swallowcliffe, Salisbury, SP3 5NX
- Dismissed11 June 20266004915The Spice Merchant, Holloway, Malmesbury, SN16 9HX
- Dismissed6 May 20266002845Land South of Drynham Lane, Trowbridge, Wiltshire, BA14 0PL
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®