Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Notice varied and upheld3 November 20233312858

Land at Green Lane, Off Potash Lane, Wyverstone, Suffolk, IP14 4SL

Planning appeal 3312858 at Land at Green Lane, Off Potash Lane, Wyverstone, Suffolk, IP14 4SL (Mid Suffolk District Council) was allowed in part (a split decision) on 3 November 2023 by Inspector Dyer S, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the steps required by the enforcement notice, particularly the removal of hardstanding, exceed what is necessary to remedy the breach of planning control or injury to amenity (ground f).

without planning permission, the change of use of the land from agriculture to a mixed use involving use of the land for the operation of a business, use of the land for the storage of shipping containers, plant and machinery associated with the business, and use of the land for the storage of waste materials associated with the business. Without planning permission, the engineering operation involving the formation of hard standing

Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
employment-industrial · Change of use
Inspector
Dyer S
Postcode
IP14 4SL

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the steps required by the enforcement notice, particularly the removal of hardstanding, exceed what is necessary to remedy the breach of planning control or injury to amenity (ground f)
  • Whether the period specified for compliance with the notice falls short of what should reasonably be allowed (ground g)

What decided it

The removal of hardstanding is necessary to remedy the breach of planning control, and the 100-day compliance period is reasonable as there is no substantiated evidence that alternative business premises could not be found within that timeframe.

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

22 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Mid Suffolk District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023

  1. Dismissed2 September 20263359620
    Keytons Pit Newton Road, Sudbury, CO10 0PY
  2. Quashed On Legal Grounds1 September 20263344278
    Walnut Meadown, Back Lane, Baylham, Ipswich, IP6 8LE
  3. Dismissed28 August 20263343778
    Bridge Field Paddock, Green Road, Haughley, Stowmarket, IP14 3RA
  4. Dismissed16 March 20263356460
    Cagmans Farm, High Road, Great Finborough, Stowmarket, Suffolk, IP14 3AP
  5. Notice upheld16 March 20263348273
    Cagmans Farm, High Road, Great Finborough, Suffolk, IP14 3AP

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.