Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed6 November 20233313244

Land South of Riverside, Maltings Road, Battlesbridge, SS11 7RH

Planning appeal 3313244 at Land South of Riverside, Maltings Road, Battlesbridge, SS11 7RH (Chelmsford Borough Council) was dismissed on 6 November 2023 by Inspector Smith A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether or not inappropriate development in the Green Belt.

Retrospective application for the retention of mobile home for residential occupancy and proposed revisions to existing gates

Authority
Chelmsford Borough Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Smith A
Postcode
SS11 7RH

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether or not inappropriate development in the Green Belt
  • The effect upon the openness of the Green Belt
  • The effect of the gates upon the character and appearance of the area
  • Whether or not acceptable development, having particular regard to the site's flood zone location
  • If found to be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, whether or not the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development

What decided it

The substantial harm to Green Belt openness combined with unacceptable flood risk for highly vulnerable residential development in Flood Zone 3 cannot be outweighed by the modest benefits claimed, and very special circumstances have not been demonstrated.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy SS11Policy DM6Policy DM10Policy DM23Policy S2Policy DM18

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

36 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Chelmsford City Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023

  1. Planning permission granted28 July 20263337730
    Former Tennis Pavillion , The Old Rodney , Spring Elms Lane, Little Baddow, Chelmsford , CM3 4SD
  2. Dismissed28 July 20266007350
    Phillips Farm, Highwood Road, Highwood, CM1 3PX
  3. Dismissed18 May 20266006009
    Emilie, Stock Road, Ingatestone, CM4 9PQ
  4. Allowed1 May 20266005305
    Field at Greenacre Lane, Stock, Ingatestone, Essex, CM4 9PR
  5. Allowed1 May 20266005303
    Field at Greenacre Lane, Stock, Ingatestone, Essex, CM4 9PR

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.