Planning appeal decision
Battle Great Barn, Marley Lane, Battle, East Sussex, TN33 0RB
Planning appeal 3313251 at Battle Great Barn, Marley Lane, Battle, East Sussex, TN33 0RB (Rother District Council) was dismissed on 28 November 2023 by Inspector Hobbs J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the appeal site is an appropriate location for a residential use, with regard to the development strategy and accessibility of facilities and services.
Detached house
- Authority
- Rother District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Hobbs J
- Postcode
- TN33 0RB
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the appeal site is an appropriate location for a residential use, with regard to the development strategy and accessibility of facilities and services
- the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the High Weald Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB)
- the effect of the proposed development on the setting of the Grade II listed Battle Great Barn
- the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of residents of Windy Ridge, with regard to privacy
- the effect of the use of the proposed access on the safety of pedestrians, cyclist and drivers using Marley Lane
What decided it
The harm to the High Weald AONB and the Grade II listed Battle Great Barn setting, combined with conflict with the development plan's locational strategy, provided clear reasons for refusal that outweighed the benefits of housing provision and sustainability measures.
The less than substantial harm to the setting of the Grade II listed Battle Great Barn and the significant harm to the AONB, together with conflict with the development plan's strategic locational objectives, outweighed the benefits of housing provision, economic benefits from construction, and sustainability measures; the shortfall in housing land supply did not alter this balance.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- CS policy OSS2CS policy OSS3CS policy OSS4CS policy RA3CS policy BA1CS policy RA2CS policy EN1CS policy EN2CS policy SRM1CS policy TR3CS policy CO6CS policy PC1BCPNP policy HD1BCPNP policy HD2BCPNP policy HD5BCPNP policy EN3BCPNP policy EN4BCPNP policy IN4DASA policy DEN1DASA policy DEN2
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 80Paragraph 219
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Rother District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023
- Dismissed22 October 2026601553265 Westfield Lane, St Leonards on Sea, TN37 7NF
- Dismissed14 October 20266007775Land Adjacent to Broadlawns, Whitebread Lane, Beckley, TN31 6TY
- Dismissed12 October 20266010105Upper Morgay Wood, Junction Road, Staplecross, TN32 5SH
- Dismissed22 September 20266008634Barn House, Warren Road, Fairlight, TN35 4AN
- Allowed21 September 20266009677Black Cottage, Henley Down, Catsfield, TN33 9BN
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®