Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed20 April 20233313417

Hurstfield House, Hague Bar, New Mills, High Peak, SK22 3AT

Planning appeal 3313417 at Hurstfield House, Hague Bar, New Mills, High Peak, SK22 3AT (High Peak Borough Council) was dismissed on 20 April 2023 by Inspector Ellison H, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt.

a detached 2 storey garage building. Parking at road level. Garden/sun room at lower garden level

Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Ellison H
Postcode
SK22 3AT

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt
  • The effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
  • If found to be inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations and if so, whether this amounts to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The proposal constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt that causes moderate harm to openness, and the other considerations advanced do not clearly outweigh this harm to justify very special circumstances.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy EQ 4Policy EQ 3Residential Design Supplementary Planning Document SPD 2
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 137Paragraph 148Paragraph 149

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

36 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in High Peak

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2023

  1. Allowed12 February 20266001092
    66 Chunal Lane, Glossop, Derbyshire, SK13 6JX
  2. Dismissed21 January 20263372294
    Cote Bank Farm, Unnamed Road From Stubbins Lane To Tithe Barn Farm, Chinley, Derbyshire, SK23 7NP
  3. Allowed8 September 20253366398
    Lodge Farm, Caravan Site , Boggard Lane , Charlesworth , Derbyshire , SK13 5HL
  4. Allowed30 April 20253357581
    How Green Barn, How Green Farm, Shiloh Road, High Peak, Derbyshire, SK22 4QR
  5. Dismissed11 April 20253351568
    Meadows Farm, Ridge Top Lane, Hayfield, High Peak, SK22 2JQ

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.